1 Revisionsvorlage (Teilrevision der Kernenergieverordnung, der Kernenergiehaftpflichtverordnung, der Ausserbetriebnahmeverordnung sowie der Gefährdungsannahmenverordnung) https://www.admin.ch/ch/d/gg/pc/ind2018.html#UVEK
2 Ozasa K, Shimizu Y, Suyama A, et al. Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases. Radiat Res. 2012;177:229-243 http://
www.rerf.jp/library/rr_e/rr1104.pdf
3 National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII Phase 2 (2006):
http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/beir_vii_final.pdf
4a Wirksamer Schutz gegen die Risiken ionisierender Niedrigstrahlung: Kenntnisstand betreffend Risiken ionisierender Strahlung im Niedrigdosisbereich; Medienmitteilung des Bundesrates vom 2. März 2018.
https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/home/themen/mensch-gesundheit/strahlung-radioaktivitaet-schall/strahlung-gesundheit/risiken-ionisierender-niedrigstrahlung.html
4b Protection efficace contre les risques des radiations ionisantes à faibles doses: L’état des connaissances sur les risques des radiations ionisantes à faibles doses; Communiqué du Conseil fédéral du 2 mars 2018.
https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/fr/home/themen/mensch-gesundheit/strahlung-radioaktivitaet-schall/strahlung-gesundheit/risiken-ionisierender-niedrigstrahlung.html
5 Richardson B, Cardis E, Daniels RD, et al. Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS). BMJ 2015;351:h5359.
http://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h5359
6 Leuraud K, Richardson DB, Cardis E, et al. Ionising radiation and risk of death from leukaemia and lymphoma in radiation-monitored workers (INWORKS): an international cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2(7):e276–e281. http://
www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lanhae/PIIS2352-3026(15)00094-0.pdf
7 Gillies M, Richardson B, Cardis E, et al. Mortality from Circulatory Diseases and other Non-Cancer Outcomes among Nuclear Workers in France, the United Kingdom and the United States (INWORKS). Radiat Res. 2017;188(3):276–90. https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28692406
8 Darby S, Hill D, Auvinen A, et al. Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. Brit Med J. 2005;330:223. http://
www.bmj.com/content/330/7485/223
9 Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:499–505.
http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(12)60815-0.pdf
10 Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, et al. Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. Brit Med J. 2013;346:f2360.
http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f2360
11 Kendall GM, Little MP, Wakeford R, et al. A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980–2006. Leukemia. 2013;27:3–9.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998763/
12 Spycher BD, Lupatsch JE, Zwahlen M, et al. for the Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group and the Swiss National Cohort Study Group. Background Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Childhood Cancer: A Census-Based Nationwide Cohort Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123:622–8.
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1408548/
13 Executive Order 13777, «Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda», by President Donald Trump, 24th February 2017.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201700139/pdf/DCPD-201700139.pdf
14 Cuttler JM, Hannum WH. Current radiation protection limits: An urgent need for change. Nuclear News. 2017;60(10):34–8.
http://radiationeffects.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Cuttler-Hannum-2017Sep_NN_Current-rad-protect-limits-C.pdf
15 Siegel JA, Pennington CW, Sacks B, et al. The Birth of the Illegitimate Linear No-Threshold Model: An Invalid Paradigm for Estimating Risk Following Low-dose Radiation Exposure. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018;41(2):173–7.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535990
16 Siegel JA, Pennington CW, Sacks B. Subjecting Radiologic Imaging to the Linear No-Threshold Hypothesis: A Non Sequitur of Non-Trivial Proportion. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(1):1–6.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493264
17 Cuttler JM, Feinendegen LE, Socol Y. Evidence that Lifelong Low Dose Rates of Ionizing Radiation Increase Lifespan in Long- and Short-Lived Dogs. Dose-Response. 2017;15(1):1–6.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5347275/
18 Calabrese EJ. LNTgate: The Ideological History of Cancer Risk Assessment. Toxicol Res Applic. 2017;1–3.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2397847317694998
20a Bei einem 10 000-jährlichen Naturereignis müssen die KKW die 100-mSv-Grenze einhalten (ENSI-Homepage, News, 1. Feb. 2018).
https://www.ensi.ch/de/2018/02/01/bei-einem-10000-jaehrlichen-naturereignis-muessen-die-kkw-die-100-msv-grenze-einhalten/
20b Les centrales nucléaires doivent tenir la valeur limite de 100 mSv pour un événement naturel se passant tous les 10 000 ans (ENSI-Homepage, News, 5. Feb. 2018).
https://www.ensi.ch/fr/2018/02/05/centrales-nucleaires-doivent-tenir-valeur-limite-de-100-msv-evenement-naturel-se-passant-10-000-ans/?noredirect=fr_FR
21 Empfehlungen der International Commission of Radiological (ICRP), Publication 103, 2007.
http://doris.bfs.de/jspui/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:0221-2009082154/1/BfS_2009_BfS-SCHR-47-09.pdf
22 «smarter medicine»: die «Top-5-Liste» der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie (SGC). Schweiz Ärztezeitung. 2018;99(1–2):12–3.
https://saez.ch/de/article/doi/saez.2018.06342/
23 Little MP, Azizova TV, Bazyka D, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Circulatory Disease from Exposure to Low-Level Ionizing Radiation and Estimates of Potential Population Mortality Risks. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:1503–11.
https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1204982/
24 Information 21.3.2018; Kanton Aargau, Departement Gesundheit und Soziales.
www.ag.ch/dgs
25 Stellungnahme des ENSI zum deterministischen Nachweis des KKB zur Beherrschung des 10 000-jährlichen Erdbebens; 7.7.2012.
http://static.ensi.ch/1341818977/kkb_sn-erdbebennachweis_final_geschwaerzt.pdf
27 ENSI. Anforderungen an die deterministische Störfallanalyse für Kernanlagen: Umfang, Methodik und Randbedingungen der technischen Störfallanalyse, Ausgabe Juli 2009, Erläuterungsbericht zur Richtlinie ENSI-A01/d, S.5, Abschnitt 2.4.1.
http://static.ensi.ch/1313045150/a-001_d_erlaueterungsbericht.pdf